Comparison · OneTwelve vs Solve Intelligence

OneTwelve vs Solve Intelligence

Solve Intelligence (sometimes searched as “Solve IP”) is a capable browser platform for drafting and prosecution. OneTwelve starts from the whole portfolio and entity landscape, and works inside Microsoft Word. Here is how the two compare, from Solve’s own public materials.

Request a Demo

The difference

The broadest office action review, multi-agent at every step.

Every review below runs several AI analyses of the office action, the cited art and the claims — limitation by limitation — and a senior review reconciles them before anything reaches your document. Measured in our case study.

  • Reasonableness review

    Tests whether the examiner’s rejections hold up against the cited art and the claims.

  • Office-action strategy — quick or deep

    An instant take on the rejections, or a full claim-by-claim strategy with prior art tested limitation by limitation.

  • Enhanced §101 argumentation

    Dedicated subject-matter-eligibility analysis and arguments, not a generic rejection template.

  • Does the art teach the amendment?

    Tests whether prior art actually teaches a proposed amendment before you commit to it.

  • Response review before filing

    Finds defects and vulnerabilities in a finished response — like missing claim fees — before it goes out the door.

  • Grade past responses

    Grades responses already filed against the office action they answered — your own, outside counsel’s, or a competitor’s.

…and it learns from your practitioners.

OneTwelve structures your entire portfolio’s prosecution history — the amendments, arguments, claim strategies and drafting of your licensed practitioners — and puts it to work on the next matter, inside Microsoft Word, in the attorney’s own voice. Not one matter or one family at a time: the whole portfolio. And it generates complete provisional applications, with Visio diagrams, from an invention disclosure.

Of the five tools compared on this site, none states in its public materials that it offers all of these reviews — or that it learns from practitioners’ work product across an entire portfolio.

What Solve Intelligence states

  • Breadth of office action review: PartialReviews each rejection for legal and factual accuracy and drafts responses; pre-filing review and grading past responses not stated[5][1]
  • Learns from your practitioners’ work product, portfolio-wide: PartialIdentifies prior arguments and amendments across family members[1]

The core difference

Where each one starts.

Solve Intelligence’s approach

A browser platform for drafting and prosecution.

Solve describes a web platform to draft, prosecute and analyze patents: style presets and templates, file wrappers downloaded from patent offices, office-action responses, and modules for claim charts and portfolio analysis.

OneTwelve’s approach

Portfolio-in, everything-out.

OneTwelve already knows your case record, your prior arguments, your ownership and assignment history, and your firm’s own prior language — and it works inside Microsoft Word, where prosecution already happens.

Side by side

Capability by capability.

Solve Intelligence column: what Solve Intelligence’s own public materials say, with sources, as of 23 September 2026.

Primary unit of workSolve Intelligence:Drafting and prosecution per matter; separate modules analyze large patent sets[1][2]The full portfolio and entity landscape
Breadth of office action reviewSolve Intelligence:PartialReviews each rejection for legal and factual accuracy and drafts responses; pre-filing review and grading past responses not stated[5][1]Reasonableness review, quick or deep office-action strategy with enhanced §101 argumentation, amendment-vs-art testing, pre-filing response review, and grading of past responses — every one multi-agent
Learns from your practitioners’ work product, portfolio-wideSolve Intelligence:PartialIdentifies prior arguments and amendments across family members[1]Yes — the amendments, arguments, claim strategies and drafting of your licensed practitioners, across the entire portfolio, put to work on the next matter
Case record assemblySolve Intelligence:Downloads full file wrappers and prosecution histories from patent offices[1]Automatic — pulls the office action, file history and cited references, no manual collection
Works inside Microsoft WordSolve Intelligence:Browser-based editor with Word-compatible output (a native Word add-in is not stated)[3][4]Native Word plug-in — no separate platform to log into
Office action response draftingSolve Intelligence:Drafts responses, arguments and claim amendments, with client reports[1]Proposed amendments, arguments and a full response draft, for attorney review in Word
Rejection & cited-art analysisSolve Intelligence:Reviews each rejection for legal and factual accuracy, including prior-art mappings[5]Each rejection tested against the cited art and the claims — including whether the art teaches the amendment
Multi-agent review, reconciled by a senior passSolve Intelligence:PartialAgents orchestrate multi-step prosecution workflows; an independent, reconciled review is not described[11]Several AI analyses of the office action, cited art and claims, limitation by limitation — then a senior review reconciles them and can overrule them
Drafts in the attorney’s voiceSolve Intelligence:Configurable style presets and templates for house or client style[6]Drafts in the attorney’s own voice, learned from their filings
Provisional application generationSolve Intelligence:PartialDrafts applications from invention disclosures, with figures; provisional applications not named[4]Complete provisional applications — a file-ready Word document plus generated Visio diagrams — from an invention disclosure
Ownership & assignment historySolve Intelligence:Not stated in public materials13.3M USPTO assignment records; full recorded chains verified against the source document
Legal-entity resolution & corporate treesSolve Intelligence:Not stated in public materials3.4M tracked legal entities, corporate subsidiary trees and a 30M-snapshot ownership history
Litigation cross-referenceSolve Intelligence:LexisNexis patent litigation data via an integration[7]PACER / CourtListener litigation records cross-referenced to the portfolio
Portfolio analytics & landscapeSolve Intelligence:Portfolio analyses, landscaping, white space, pruning and dashboards[2]No portfolio cap — tech-scope and jurisdictional breakdowns, landscapes, clearance analysis and where your claims overlap competitors’ technology
Examiner & practitioner benchmarkingSolve Intelligence:PartialExaminer statistics via a Juristat integration (Juristat subscription)[8]Examiners, art units and practitioners benchmarked against outcomes
Maintenance-fee forecastingSolve Intelligence:PartialModels renewal and maintenance fees for pruning decisions[9]Per-patent and portfolio-wide forecasts; OCR confirms the fee paperwork actually on file
Setup requiredSolve Intelligence:Practitioner-led onboarding, training and firm-specific configuration[10]None — open Word, launch the plug-in, and it’s ready to go

Solve Intelligence capabilities are drawn from Solve Intelligence’s own public materials as of 23 September 2026; OneTwelve has not independently tested them. “Not stated in public materials” means we found no public claim either way — not that the capability is absent. Solve Intelligence is a trademark of its owner. Corrections: [email protected].

Fair credit

Where Solve Intelligence is strong.

A comparison is only useful if it is honest. From Solve Intelligence’s own materials:

  • Breadth in one platform — drafting with figures, chemical structures and sequence listings, prosecution, claim charts, portfolio analytics and translation.
  • Multi-jurisdiction prosecution, with file wrappers downloaded from the USPTO, EPO, DPMA, IP Australia, WIPO and JPO.
  • Strong security claims: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, and no training on customer data.
  • Wide adoption — the company states 700+ in-house IP teams and law firms, with integrations for iManage, Juristat and LexisNexis.

Why architecture matters

A tool that only sees the document in front of it can draft competent language. A tool that sees your whole portfolio can tell you whether that language is consistent with what you’ve argued before, whether the entity you’re citing has a documented ownership history, and whether the claim you’re amending has already been contested elsewhere in your family.

That’s the difference between standard artificial intelligence and Institutional Intelligence.

See the measured head-to-headHow the Word Plug-In works

Sources (accessed 23 September 2026)

  1. [1]Solve — Patent prosecution capabilities
  2. [2]Solve — Patent portfolio analyses
  3. [3]TechCrunch — Solve Intelligence (Nov 2023)
  4. [4]Solve — Patent application drafting
  5. [5]Solve — Prosecution product page
  6. [6]Solve — Custom styles
  7. [7]Solve — LexisNexis litigation data integration
  8. [8]Solve — Juristat partnership
  9. [9]Solve — Patent pruning
  10. [10]Solve — Thomson Reuters partnership
  11. [11]Solve — Powered by Claude (agents)

Other comparisons: OneTwelve vs DeepIP · OneTwelve vs Patlytics · OneTwelve vs Harrity Patent Navigator · OneTwelve vs Patsnap

Request a Demo

Ready to see what Day One could look like?

Tell us a bit about you and your team, and we’ll set up a walkthrough on the kind of work you actually do.

By submitting, you agree we may contact you about your request. See our Privacy Policy.